4 Comments
User's avatar
TheNube.ai's avatar

Love this. And particularly the alphabet soup.

ISO 27001

ISO 27002

ISO 27005

IEC 62443

NIST CSF

NIST SP 800-53

NIST SP 800-171

CIS Controls

COBIT

ITIL

SOC 1

SOC 2

SOC 3

CSA CCM

FISMA

FedRAMP

CMMC

HIPAA Security Rule

GLBA Safeguards Rule

GDPR

ePrivacy Directive

EU Data Governance Act

EU Data Act

CCPA

CPRA

VCDPA

CPA

UCPA

HIPAA Privacy Rule

LGPD

PDPA

POPIA

PIPEDA

APPI

Basel III

CRR

CRD IV

CRD V

Dodd-Frank

SOX

MiFID II

EMIR

PSD2

PSD3

IFRS

COSO

ERM

ICAAP

ILAAP

SR 11-7

DORA

NIS2

Cyber Resilience Act

Digital Markets Act

Digital Services Act

eIDAS

eIDAS 2.0

EU AI Act

NIST AI RMF

ISO/IEC 23894

ISO/IEC 42001

OECD AI Principles

UNESCO AI Ethics

ISO 27017

ISO 27018

CSA STAR

ENS

BSI C5

HITRUST

HITECH

PCI DSS

PCI PIN

PCI P2PE

NERC CIP

IEC 62351

ISO 26262

UNECE R155

UNECE R156

ISO 22301

ISO 22316

ISO 31000

ISO 15489

ISO 37301

ISAE 3402

CSRD

ESRS

TCFD

GRI

SASB

CDP

EU Taxonomy

shaughnessy's avatar

You basically listed ale the problems and yet failed to propose any realistic solutions. To think people don't want to use APIs or AI? Of course they do. Is it always feasible and possible to use such integrations? Of course not.

Your observations are also rather shallow , e g. EU being the regulatory superpower vs lack of standardized federal laws for privacy in the us

Elvis Moreland's avatar

Since the Rainbow Series, MIL-STD-1785, and the IATF we learned as security pioneers in the public sectors that both static and dynamic elements of life cycle were required. But those who came after us in the private sectors were not mentored, trained, or apprenticed made assumptions that all requirements can be answered with just a static response or process outside of the life cycle. The revolution happened before just not heard with the lessons learned from the Rainbow Series, MIL-STD-1785, or the IATF v3.1.